March 3rd : Prompt: Today we focused on constructing a strong literary argument paragraph about Wild and whether discomfort is necessary for meaningful personal growth. After working through the claim-evidence-analysis structure, explain which part of the paragraph was most challenging for you and why. Do you find it more difficult to create an arguable claim or to move beyond summary in your analysis?
When we wrote an arguable claim for Wilde, the hardest part for me was going beyond to support my claim. I found it difficult to not summarize, I feel as though I need to summarize for it to make sense to the reader, Especially when it proves a point I feel as though I go overboard with summarizing. Once I can get past the claim it is a bit easier, but also writing the thesis makes it hard because I'm not sure if it might be right and I end up defending the wrong point, or I don't find enough evidence.
Comments
Post a Comment